Xtrackers vs Roundhill: ETF issuers compared

Every dot is one sectors fund, placed at its 1-year return. Right of the line = made money. The ringed dot is the middle fund. Small sample: fewer than 3 funds on a side.

BOX SCORE · SECTORS	Xtrackers	Roundhill
Funds in the category	1	1
Made money (W–L)	0–1	0–0
Win %	0%	—
Money made	−$46M	—
Typical return	−4.2%	—
Launches · 2026	0	1
Assets	$1.1B	$3M
Fee per $100	$0.10	$0.59

The biggest sectors funds on each side

Xtrackers

Fund	Name	Assets	1Y
HAUZ	Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF	$1.1B	−4.2% ✕

Roundhill

Fund	Name	Assets	1Y
CABZ	Roundhill Investments - Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	$3M	—

Twin funds: Xtrackers is cheaper in 1 of 1. 1-year returns split evenly.

Pairs that hold the same market. Fee = per $100 a year. Returns within 0.1 points are a tie; 5-year returns are per year.

CHEAPER1 – 00 tieBETTER 1Y0 – 01 tieBETTER 5Y0 – 00 tie

Bonds & cash · 1

XtrackersFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeRoundhill

TRSY$0.06+3.4%—T-bills—+3.3%$0.19WEEK

Squares, left to right: fee · 1 year · 5 years, coloured by who won. Most gaps come from different index rules, not fees.

Share this matchup

A picture of the tape, with the link back to it.

Post on X

The made–lost record behind every Win %
The date of the data
The link to the live matchup
“Not advice”, on the card itself

The past year. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.

Tale of the tape

Sectors: too few funds to call

The biggest sectors funds on each side

X Xtrackers

R Roundhill

Bonds & cash · 1

Share this matchup

Xtrackers

Roundhill