Loading issuers…
Loading issuers…
ProShares made investors more money ($3.1B) and had more funds that made money (51%).
The past year, all their funds · Data as of Nov 3, 2026
Tale of the tape 1Y · lower fee wins
Every dot is one sectors fund, placed at its 1-year return. Right of the line = made money. The ringed dot is the middle fund. Small sample: fewer than 3 funds on a side.
| BOX SCORE · SECTORS | ProShares | REX Microsectors |
|---|---|---|
| Funds in the category | 4 | 1 |
| Made money (W–L) | 2–2 | 1–0 |
| Win % | 50% | 100% |
| Money made | $1M | $5M |
| Typical return | +20.8% | +18.0% |
| Launches · 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Assets | $74M | $31M |
| Fee per $100 | $0.58 | $0.95 |
| Fund | Name | Assets | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONLN | ProShares - Online Retail ETF | $58M | −1.6% ✕ |
| TINY | ProShares - Nanotechnology ETF | $12M | +21.3% ✓ |
| EMTY | ProShares - Decline of the Retail Store ETF | $3M | −6.6% ✕ |
| TINT | ProShares - Smart Materials ETF | $2M | +20.8% ✓ |
| Fund | Name | Assets | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNKU | MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks 3 Leveraged ETN | $31M | +18.0% ✓ |
The past year. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.