ProShares vs Global X: ETF issuers compared

Every dot is one low-cost core fund, placed at its 1-year return. Right of the line = made money. The ringed dot is the middle fund. Small sample: fewer than 3 funds on a side.

BOX SCORE · LOW-COST CORE	ProShares	Global X
Funds in the category	4	1
Made money (W–L)	4–0	1–0
Win %	100%	100%
Money made	$56M	$248K
Typical return	+11.7%	+12.3%
Launches · 2026	0	0
Assets	$530M	$2M
Fee per $100	$0.09	$0.19

The biggest low-cost core funds on each side

ProShares

Fund	Name	Assets	1Y
SPXT	ProShares - S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	$327M	+12.4% ✓
SPXE	ProShares - S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF	$85M	+10.5% ✓
SPXN	ProShares - S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	$78M	+11.7% ✓
SPXV	ProShares - S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF	$40M	+9.8% ✓

Global X

Fund	Name	Assets	1Y
EGLE	Global X - S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF	$2M	+12.3% ✓

Twin funds: ProShares is cheaper in 2 of 3. ProShares returned more in 2.

Pairs that hold the same market. Fee = per $100 a year. Returns within 0.1 points are a tie; 5-year returns are per year.

CHEAPER2 – 10 tieBETTER 1Y2 – 00 tieBETTER 5Y0 – 10 tie

Thematic · 1

ProSharesFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeGlobal X

TOLZ$0.46+15.8%+8.2%Infrastructure+15.3%+14.3%$0.47PAVE

Income · 2

ProSharesFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeGlobal X

IQQQ$0.55+3.7%—Nasdaq-100+1.6%+2.2%$0.60QRMI
ACSP$0.72——S&P 500+2.6%+6.9%$0.60XRMI

Squares, left to right: fee · 1 year · 5 years, coloured by who won. Most gaps come from different index rules, not fees.

Share this matchup

A picture of the tape, with the link back to it.

Post on X

The made–lost record behind every Win %
The date of the data
The link to the live matchup
“Not advice”, on the card itself

The past year. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.

Tale of the tape

Low-cost core: Global X wins, 100% to 100% of funds made money