PGIM vs J.P. Morgan: ETF issuers compared | ETF Tracker

Skip to content

Talking about all things ETFs.

The ETF Trackerby

Markets Portfolio Issuers Visualizations Compare

⌕

Loading issuers…

PGIM vs J.P. Morgan: ETF issuers compared | ETF Tracker

Skip to content

VTI▼ −0.4%VOO▼ −0.5%IVV▼ −0.5%SPY▼ −0.5%VXUS▲ +0.3%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.2%BND▼ −0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.2%VO▲ +0.2%IEFA▲ +0.3%SPYM▼ −0.5%VGT▼ −2.7%VB▲ +0.6%VWO▲ +0.3%IEMG▲ +0.2%AGG▼ −0.2%GLD▲ +1.6%VIG▲ +0.2%XLK▼ −2.9%IJH▲ +0.8%BNDX▼ −0.1%SCHD▲ +0.3%IWF▼ −1.2%SGOV▼ −0.3%IJR▲ +0.8%QQQM▼ −1.4%VT▼ −0.1%RSP▲ +0.8%

VTI▼ −0.4%VOO▼ −0.5%IVV▼ −0.5%SPY▼ −0.5%VXUS▲ +0.3%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.2%BND▼ −0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.2%VO▲ +0.2%IEFA▲ +0.3%SPYM▼ −0.5%VGT▼ −2.7%VB▲ +0.6%VWO▲ +0.3%IEMG▲ +0.2%AGG▼ −0.2%GLD▲ +1.6%VIG▲ +0.2%XLK▼ −2.9%IJH▲ +0.8%BNDX▼ −0.1%SCHD▲ +0.3%IWF▼ −1.2%SGOV▼ −0.3%IJR▲ +0.8%QQQM▼ −1.4%VT▼ −0.1%RSP▲ +0.8%

The ETF Trackerby

Markets Portfolio Issuers Visualizations Compare

⌕

← Issuer rankingsSwap sides Change issuers

P

PGIMPrudential · 70 funds · $42.3B

VS

JM

J.P. Morgan80 funds · $357B

PGIM made investors more money ($3M). J.P. Morgan had more funds that made money (56%).

The past month, all their funds · Data as of Nov 3, 2026

1M YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y

Tale of the tape

PGIM LEADS4of 9 matchups called

Money made
Fee per $100
Buffered
Income

Tale of the tape 1M · lower fee wins

70Fundsin total80

21–49Made moneymade–lost, 1 month45–35

30%Win %funds that made money

ETF Tracker · Talking about all things ETFsNot investment advice.

Daily email For issuers Terms Privacy Data sources

56%

$3MMoney madefor investors, 1 month−$4.3B

−0.3%Typical returnmiddle fund, 1 month+0.3%

9Launchesnew funds in 20265

$42.3BAssetsmoney invested$357B

$0.21Fee per $100paid each year · lower wins$0.29

J.P. MORGAN LEADS5of 9 matchups called

Win %
Typical return
Bonds & cash
US stocks
+1 more

Categories ↓Share

Who wins each category · share of its funds that made money · 1M

PGIM 2 · J.P. Morgan 3

Bufferedsmall sample

−$24MMADE−$49M−0.5%TYPICAL−1.0%PMNV+0.6%BESTHELO−1.0%Open 49 funds →Bonds & cash

79%11 of 14

96%22 of 23

$45MMADE$1.1B+0.7%TYPICAL+1.7%PCL+3.0%BESTBBLB+5.5%Open 37 funds →US stocks

63%12 of 19

−$11MMADE−$973M−1.1%TYPICAL+0.9%PJSM+0.8%BESTJPSV+5.8%Open 24 funds →Internationalsmall sample

−$7MMADE−$1.0B−1.6%TYPICAL−1.0%PJIN−1.6%BESTBBCA+3.9%Open 17 funds →Incomesmall sample

$100KMADE−$2.6B+0.4%TYPICAL−0.8%PINC+0.4%BESTJPRE+5.3%Open 10 funds →

Twin funds: J.P. Morgan is cheaper in 4 of 6. 1-year returns split evenly.

Pairs that hold the same market. Fee = per $100 a year. Returns within 0.1 points are a tie; 5-year returns are per year.

CHEAPER2 – 40 tieBETTER 1Y3 – 30 tieBETTER 5Y1 – 00 tie

US stocks · 3

PGIMFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeJ.P. Morgan

PJFG$0.75−0.6%—Large growth—−6.3%$0.44JGRO
PJFV$0.33+24.9%—Large value+11.5%+22.0%$0.44JAVA
PJFM$0.49+8.9%—Mid caps+7.1%+20.3%$0.07BBMC

Bonds & cash · 3

PGIMFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeJ.P. Morgan

PHYL$0.39+0.9%+3.4%Active High Yield—+2.2%$0.45JPHY
PAB$0.19−0.4%−0.0%Total bond market−0.4%−0.6%$0.03BBAG
PCL$0.25−4.8%—Corporate bonds−0.4%+0.6%$0.04BBCB

Squares, left to right: fee · 1 year · 5 years, coloured by who won. Most gaps come from different index rules, not fees.

Share this matchup

A picture of the tape, with the link back to it.

The made–lost record behind every Win %
The date of the data
The link to the live matchup
“Not advice”, on the card itself

The past month. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.