Loading issuers…
VTI▼ −0.2%VOO▼ −0.4%IVV▼ −0.3%SPY▼ −0.4%VXUS▼ −0.1%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.3%BND▲ +0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.9%VO▲ +0.8%IEFA▲ +0.6%SPYM▼ −0.3%VGT▼ −1.1%VB▲ +1.3%VWO▼ −0.7%IEMG▼ −1.3%AGG▲ +0.3%GLD▼ −1.3%VIG▲ +1.3%XLK▼ −1.2%IJH▲ +1.2%IWF▼ −1.5%BNDX▲ +0.1%SCHD▲ +1.5%SGOV▲ +0.0%QQQM▼ −1.4%IJR▲ +1.6%RSP▲ +1.2%VT▼ −0.2%
Oakmark and Vanguard, side by side.
The past 3 years, all their funds · Data as of Oct 30, 2026
Tale of the tape
OAKMARK LEADS0of 1 matchups called
Tale of the tape 3Y · lower fee wins
4Fundsin total116
0–0Made moneymade–lost, 3 years82–0
—Win %funds that made money100%
—Money madefor investors, 3 years$3.62T
—Typical returnmiddle fund, 3 years+69.0%
1Launchesnew funds in 202613
$1.6BAssetsmoney invested$8.70T
$0.64Fee per $100paid each year · lower wins$0.04
VANGUARD LEADS1of 1 matchups called
- Fee per $100
Who wins each category · share of its funds that made money · 3Y
Oakmark 0 · Vanguard 0Twin funds: Vanguard is cheaper in 1 of 1. Oakmark returned more in 1.
Pairs that hold the same market. Fee = per $100 a year. Returns within 0.1 points are a tie; 5-year returns are per year.
CHEAPER0 – 10 tieBETTER 1Y1 – 00 tieBETTER 5Y0 – 00 tie
Squares, left to right: fee · 1 year · 5 years, coloured by who won. Most gaps come from different index rules, not fees.
The past 3 years. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.