Loading issuers…
VTI▼ −0.4%VOO▼ −0.5%IVV▼ −0.5%SPY▼ −0.5%VXUS▲ +0.3%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.2%BND▼ −0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.2%VO▲ +0.2%IEFA▲ +0.3%SPYM▼ −0.5%VGT▼ −2.7%VB▲ +0.6%VWO▲ +0.3%IEMG▲ +0.2%AGG▼ −0.2%GLD▲ +1.6%VIG▲ +0.2%XLK▼ −2.9%IJH▲ +0.8%BNDX▼ −0.1%SCHD▲ +0.3%IWF▼ −1.2%SGOV▼ −0.3%IJR▲ +0.8%QQQM▼ −1.4%VT▼ −0.1%RSP▲ +0.8%
ETRACS made investors more money ($481M). AAM had more funds that made money (100%).
The past 5 years, all their funds · Data as of Nov 3, 2026
Tale of the tape
ETRACS LEADS2of 6 matchups called
- Money made
- Typical return
Tale of the tape 5Y · lower fee wins
15Fundsin total10
11–3Made moneymade–lost, 5 years2–0
79%Win %funds that made money100%
$481MMoney madefor investors, 5 years$53M
+67.7%Typical returnmiddle fund, 5 years+64.6%
0Launchesnew funds in 20261
$1.2BAssetsmoney invested$1.0B
$0.75Fee per $100paid each year · lower wins$0.45
AAM LEADS4of 6 matchups called
- Win %
- Fee per $100
- Income
- Bonds & cash
Who wins each category · share of its funds that made money · 5Y
ETRACS 0 · AAM 2The past 5 years. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.