Alliance Bernstein vs J.P. Morgan: ETF issuers compared | ETF Tracker

Skip to content

Talking about all things ETFs.

The ETF Trackerby

Markets Portfolio Issuers Visualizations Compare

⌕

Loading issuers…

Alliance Bernstein vs J.P. Morgan: ETF issuers compared | ETF Tracker

Skip to content

VTI▼ −0.4%VOO▼ −0.5%IVV▼ −0.5%SPY▼ −0.5%VXUS▲ +0.3%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.2%BND▼ −0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.2%VO▲ +0.2%IEFA▲ +0.3%SPYM▼ −0.5%VGT▼ −2.7%VB▲ +0.6%VWO▲ +0.3%IEMG▲ +0.2%AGG▼ −0.2%GLD▲ +1.6%VIG▲ +0.2%XLK▼ −2.9%IJH▲ +0.8%BNDX▼ −0.1%SCHD▲ +0.3%IWF▼ −1.2%SGOV▼ −0.3%IJR▲ +0.8%QQQM▼ −1.4%VT▼ −0.1%RSP▲ +0.8%

VTI▼ −0.4%VOO▼ −0.5%IVV▼ −0.5%SPY▼ −0.5%VXUS▲ +0.3%QQQ▼ −1.4%VUG▼ −1.2%BND▼ −0.3%VEA▲ +0.2%VTV▲ +0.2%VO▲ +0.2%IEFA▲ +0.3%SPYM▼ −0.5%VGT▼ −2.7%VB▲ +0.6%VWO▲ +0.3%IEMG▲ +0.2%AGG▼ −0.2%GLD▲ +1.6%VIG▲ +0.2%XLK▼ −2.9%IJH▲ +0.8%BNDX▼ −0.1%SCHD▲ +0.3%IWF▼ −1.2%SGOV▼ −0.3%IJR▲ +0.8%QQQM▼ −1.4%VT▼ −0.1%RSP▲ +0.8%

The ETF Trackerby

Markets Portfolio Issuers Visualizations Compare

⌕

← Issuer rankingsSwap sides Change issuers

AB

Alliance Bernstein24 funds · $22.0B

VS

JM

J.P. Morgan80 funds · $357B

J.P. Morgan made investors more money ($24.9B) and had more funds that made money (84%).

The past year, all their funds · Data as of Nov 3, 2026

1M YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y

Tale of the tape

ALLIANCE BERNSTEIN LEADS4of 9 matchups called

Bonds & cash
US stocks
Income
Buffered

Tale of the tape 1Y · lower fee wins

24Fundsin total80

14–5Made moneymade–lost, 1 year59–11

ETF Tracker · Talking about all things ETFsNot investment advice.

Daily email For issuers Terms Privacy Data sources

74%

Win %funds that made money

84%

$767MMoney madefor investors, 1 year$24.9B

+2.8%Typical returnmiddle fund, 1 year+9.8%

2Launchesnew funds in 20265

$22.0BAssetsmoney invested$357B

$0.44Fee per $100paid each year · lower wins$0.29

J.P. MORGAN LEADS5of 9 matchups called

Win %
Money made
Typical return
Fee per $100
+1 more

Categories ↓Share

Who wins each category · share of its funds that made money · 1Y

Alliance Bernstein 4 · J.P. Morgan 1

Bonds & cash

60%12 of 20

$104MMADE$1.7B+1.5%TYPICAL+0.3%YEAR+2.9%BESTJPST+3.2%Open 35 funds →US stocks

94%16 of 17

$133MMADE$5.2B+9.3%TYPICAL+20.3%LRGC+9.3%BESTLVDS+28.3%Open 23 funds →International

100%14 of 14

$206MMADE$10.3B+6.5%TYPICAL+13.6%ILOW+12.1%BESTJIVE+25.5%Open 19 funds →Incomesmall sample

$29MMADE$7.1B+16.2%TYPICAL+9.2%HIDV+16.2%BESTJPRE+12.9%Open 10 funds →Bufferedsmall sample

$84MMADE$249M+5.8%TYPICAL+5.4%BUFC+5.8%BESTHELO+5.4%Open 4 funds →

Twin funds: J.P. Morgan is cheaper in 3 of 4. 1-year returns split evenly.

Pairs that hold the same market. Fee = per $100 a year. Returns within 0.1 points are a tie; 5-year returns are per year.

CHEAPER1 – 30 tieBETTER 1Y1 – 10 tieBETTER 5Y0 – 00 tie

International · 1

Alliance BernsteinFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeJ.P. Morgan

EMOP$0.70——Emerging markets+5.4%+16.3%$0.33JEMA

Bonds & cash · 2

Alliance BernsteinFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeJ.P. Morgan

CORB$0.28——Total bond market−0.4%−0.6%$0.03BBAG
EYEG$0.30−2.7%—Corporate bonds−0.4%+0.6%$0.04BBCB

Income · 1

Alliance BernsteinFee1Y5Y5Y1YFeeJ.P. Morgan

HIDV$0.35+16.2%—Dividend stocks—+5.9%$0.47JDIV

Squares, left to right: fee · 1 year · 5 years, coloured by who won. Most gaps come from different index rules, not fees.

Share this matchup

A picture of the tape, with the link back to it.

The made–lost record behind every Win %
The date of the data
The link to the live matchup
“Not advice”, on the card itself

The past year. Win % counts funds, not dollars; money made is estimated from each fund’s assets and return. Categories with fewer than 3 funds on a side are flagged. Not advice.